occur to me to compare the two. I have no active dislike for dogs, any
more than I have for monkeys, human beings, tradesmen, cows, sheep, or
pterodactyls; but for the cat I have entertained a particular respect and
affection ever since the earliest days of my infancy. In its flawless
grace and superior self-sufficiency I have seen a symbol of the perfect
beauty and bland impersonality of the universe itself, objectively
considered, and in its air of silent mystery there resides for me all the
wonder and fascination of the unknown. The dog appeals to cheap and facile
emotions; the cat to the deepest founts of imagination and cosmic
perception in the human mind. It is no accident that the contemplative
Egyptians, together with such later poetic spirits as Poe, Gautier,
Baudelaire and Swinburne, were all sincere worshippers of the supple
grimalkin.
Naturally, one's preference in the matter of cats and dogs depends wholly
upon one's temperament and point of view. The dog would appear to me to be
the favorite of superficial, sentimental, and emotional people -- people
who feel rather than think, who attach importance to mankind and the
popular conventional emotions of the simple, and who find their greatest
consolation in the fawning and dependent attachments of a gregarious
society. Such people live in a limited world of imagination; accepting
uncritically the values of common folklore, and always preferring to have
their naive beliefs, feelings, and prejudices tickled, rather than to
<<BackPagesTo menuNext>>